In financial economics, the efficient-market hypothesis states that asset prices fully reflect all available information. A direct implication is that it is impossible to "beat the market" consistently on a risk-adjusted basis since market prices should only react to new information or changes in discount rates.
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) states that it is not easy to beat the market because the stock market efficiency reflects all the information. It further talks about stocks and how they always trade at fair value, which makes it hard for investors to sell them at a higher price. This is the main reason why it is not possible for an individual to outperform the market with the help of just stock selection.
In order to get higher returns, the only way out is to make investments that are deemed to be risky.
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is a controversial financial theory, which is why there are a lot of disputes between experts. Some state that there is no use of looking at undervalued stocks or predict the changing trends in the market by using technical analysis.
On the other hand, there are people who say that there is evidence that supports the theory. In order to understand the complexity of the theory, take the example of Warren Buffet who has actually beaten the market, which is something that is not possible according to the theory.
There are several limitations to the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Firstly, the empirical evidence is a little mixed up, but the data that is present does not strongly support the theory. Secondly, there is an anomaly that is presented to us in the form of speculative economic bubbles that states the market is operated by buyers who don’t take into account the underlying value. The anomalies that are presented are basically a result of the cost benefit analysis that is done by people who want to acquire information so they can trade on it.
The theory was scrutinized after the financial crises that persisted from 2007 to 2012. The EMH met with fierce criticism and it is said that the theory makes financial leaders underestimate the dangers of asset bubbles breaking.
Financial education is so important, but barely taught at all in our schools. Having resources online is great, but not if they are inaccessible to so many. Thanks 508!